Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-17 08:10:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EA16FB7726BE9E7C167A0C8C98946EE32C320B4246054FEBA60BC10AEC2F1F0B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article refers to a publication that is neither published or peer reviewed, conclusions cannot be considered scientific. Scientific publications are subject to peer reviews to guarantee the soundness of the analysis. (source: Nature guidelines) https://www.nature.com/nature/for-authors/editorial-criteria-and-processes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769129362375225630
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EA16FB7726BE9E7C167A0C8C98946EE32C320B4246054FEBA60BC10AEC2F1F0B
  • createdAtMillis - 1710663011013
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769129362375225630EA16FB7726BE9E7C167A0C8C98946EE32C320B4246054FEBA60BC10AEC2F1F0B