Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-20 00:43:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A197C174731B39266EDFD16417A81E68762D7870D81E16939B4A52987FA21643
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The graphs are neither fake nor old. The user’s TL explains methodology and the publicly verifiable data sources used to create the charts presented. Ironically, the posted notes’ URL data provided support the charts, as the calculations include those datasets.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769115698251399452
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A197C174731B39266EDFD16417A81E68762D7870D81E16939B4A52987FA21643
  • createdAtMillis - 1710895425807
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769115698251399452A197C174731B39266EDFD16417A81E68762D7870D81E16939B4A52987FA21643