Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-17 09:10:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7803CEDE19DBFD32B1E7CC94E0EB4A34DEE5EC92167DE5EFEEB27826CBE2C9B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The graphs are neither fake nor old. The user’s TL explains methodology and the publicly verifiable data sources used to create the charts presented. Ironically, the posted notes’ URL data provided support the charts, as the calculations include those datasets.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769115698251399452
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7803CEDE19DBFD32B1E7CC94E0EB4A34DEE5EC92167DE5EFEEB27826CBE2C9B8
  • createdAtMillis - 1710666618384
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17691156982513994527803CEDE19DBFD32B1E7CC94E0EB4A34DEE5EC92167DE5EFEEB27826CBE2C9B8