Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 20:37:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 155C583DC6DA86890EEF438DBA4ECA29B4106A26C73B62F075A2FB878729AEBB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The graphs are neither fake nor old. The user’s TL explains methodology and the publicly verifiable data sources used to create the charts presented. Ironically, the posted notes’ URL data provided support the charts, as the calculations include those datasets.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769115698251399452
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 155C583DC6DA86890EEF438DBA4ECA29B4106A26C73B62F075A2FB878729AEBB
  • createdAtMillis - 1710880650711
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769115698251399452155C583DC6DA86890EEF438DBA4ECA29B4106A26C73B62F075A2FB878729AEBB