Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-16 20:51:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 608FFB1639F2548767AAE1A99A235BAA0C47D10360469076C4E80C5FC4410A0D
Participant Details

Original Note:

El artículo científico plantea un análisis de riesgos con una metodología ideada para brotes y no pandemias. Además, tiene importantes limitaciones y sus conclusiones son claramente subjetivas. https://www.nationalgeographic.com.es/ciencia/pandemia-covid19-fue-natural-o-artificial-respuesta-no-es-tan-sencilla_21863

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769038500941201769
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 608FFB1639F2548767AAE1A99A235BAA0C47D10360469076C4E80C5FC4410A0D
  • createdAtMillis - 1710622295883
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769038500941201769608FFB1639F2548767AAE1A99A235BAA0C47D10360469076C4E80C5FC4410A0D