Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-17 00:31:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEEC09574496B09CD633F7F9A20E078787E2409C546A66DC544BF897B280AA65
Participant Details

Original Note:

元ポストが「同じ罪状にもかかわらず求刑が異なる」という主張であれば「罪状が異なる点に注意してください」というcnに妥当性がありますが、元ポストは「行為が同じにも関わらず罪状が異なる」という内容であり、CN筆者の誤読であると思われます。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769026428895690889
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CEEC09574496B09CD633F7F9A20E078787E2409C546A66DC544BF897B280AA65
  • createdAtMillis - 1710635482491
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769026428895690889CEEC09574496B09CD633F7F9A20E078787E2409C546A66DC544BF897B280AA65