Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-16 16:36:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8FA7B38100BBE1C4EA8BD33FA80EB12C1D1008615D0B5C2CD13ADAD05439036C
Participant Details

Original Note:

元ポストが「同じ罪状にもかかわらず求刑が異なる」という主張であれば「罪状が異なる点に注意してください」というcnに妥当性がありますが、元ポストは「行為が同じにも関わらず罪状が異なる」という内容であり、CN筆者の誤読であると思われます。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769026428895690889
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8FA7B38100BBE1C4EA8BD33FA80EB12C1D1008615D0B5C2CD13ADAD05439036C
  • createdAtMillis - 1710607005136
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17690264288956908898FA7B38100BBE1C4EA8BD33FA80EB12C1D1008615D0B5C2CD13ADAD05439036C