Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-17 08:15:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 719C279E925A1FFA0427D68BF1243D9351E867D9E7169323BB5CBB9931DED11A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN These people are whacko but that doesn't mean you get to tag them with a CN. Citing a study doesn't help because the majority of studies published turn out to be wrong (see Ioannidis below). Argue in the comments. https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768985178758692875
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 719C279E925A1FFA0427D68BF1243D9351E867D9E7169323BB5CBB9931DED11A
  • createdAtMillis - 1710663340941
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1768985178758692875719C279E925A1FFA0427D68BF1243D9351E867D9E7169323BB5CBB9931DED11A