Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-16 17:31:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BE6EC80D5C74851E665F753C0D6A360B1ED749A9ECA9F1DA18C2626F0AB6FFEC
Participant Details

Original Note:

C’est faux, et c’est un hoax datant de 2022. L’autorité chinois a également démenti https://factuel.afp.com/doc.afp.com.324B9HW

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768979052340052235
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BE6EC80D5C74851E665F753C0D6A360B1ED749A9ECA9F1DA18C2626F0AB6FFEC
  • createdAtMillis - 1710610263636
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1768979052340052235BE6EC80D5C74851E665F753C0D6A360B1ED749A9ECA9F1DA18C2626F0AB6FFEC