Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-21 05:21:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7A010E008576708296CEB2130B1B2749F2CE2D3E0F12D1CCB26EBE3822E0D61B
Participant Details

Original Note:

C’est faux, et c’est un hoax datant de 2022. L’autorité chinois a également démenti https://factuel.afp.com/doc.afp.com.324B9HW

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768979052340052235
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7A010E008576708296CEB2130B1B2749F2CE2D3E0F12D1CCB26EBE3822E0D61B
  • createdAtMillis - 1710998505857
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17689790523400522357A010E008576708296CEB2130B1B2749F2CE2D3E0F12D1CCB26EBE3822E0D61B