Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-16 19:36:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4DB8C97F2038BB255AA30A99FA75385CC0DE724D24F482D6A046969AD5E1A54D
Participant Details

Original Note:

C’est faux, et c’est un hoax datant de 2022. L’autorité chinois a également démenti https://factuel.afp.com/doc.afp.com.324B9HW

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768979052340052235
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4DB8C97F2038BB255AA30A99FA75385CC0DE724D24F482D6A046969AD5E1A54D
  • createdAtMillis - 1710617779755
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17689790523400522354DB8C97F2038BB255AA30A99FA75385CC0DE724D24F482D6A046969AD5E1A54D