Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-16 12:58:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E8FDCC52E3FC8B09A55582B8DF90A475C1D7F53245FBE1FCD024D16F1B9F27D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNNNN Ni el tuit ni la noticia indican que Puente deba obedecer al Supremo de EEUU o que éste tenga jurisdicción. Expresa la opinión de que el fallo, que indica a que los cargos públicos no pueden usar sus redes como si fueran ciudadanos corrientes, debería ser tenido en cuenta.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768970757814554935
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E8FDCC52E3FC8B09A55582B8DF90A475C1D7F53245FBE1FCD024D16F1B9F27D
  • createdAtMillis - 1710593911998
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17689707578145549355E8FDCC52E3FC8B09A55582B8DF90A475C1D7F53245FBE1FCD024D16F1B9F27D