Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-16 00:42:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41A68F9D250768806DE253D016C84DD886C92715C075856F14045D52AA77D1C8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Esta noticia es FALSA. 1- La normativa de EEUU no se aplica a España ni a ningún otro país, solo a EEUU. 2- El Supremo de EEUU no se ha dirigido a Puente NUNCA. 3- El Supremo dictamina lo contrario: se puede bloquear y borrar en una cuenta de uso personal, no de instituciones https://elpais.com/tecnologia/2024-03-15/puede-un-cargo-publico-bloquear-a-sus-seguidores-en-las-redes-sociales.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768797173984972979
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41A68F9D250768806DE253D016C84DD886C92715C075856F14045D52AA77D1C8
  • createdAtMillis - 1710549767953
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176879717398497297941A68F9D250768806DE253D016C84DD886C92715C075856F14045D52AA77D1C8