Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-16 12:18:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EDF1D72687B119FCDFD42054622046B2ABC2450C87AFE328E531B649496D93DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. From the decision: “. . . the Court finds the allegations and evidence legally insufficient to support a finding of an actual conflict of interest.” https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24482779-order-on-defendants-motions-to-dismiss-and-disqualify-the-fulton-county-district-attorney

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768776558657859628
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EDF1D72687B119FCDFD42054622046B2ABC2450C87AFE328E531B649496D93DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1710591530816
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1768776558657859628EDF1D72687B119FCDFD42054622046B2ABC2450C87AFE328E531B649496D93DD