Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-15 21:36:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2FF872A9C4E9DD85039724607E78DBA2EF443987A3C0CAEAB62A60B4BDA23AD6
Participant Details

Original Note:

このlancet論文の話は麻疹ワクチンではなく、曝露後の麻疹の抗体の投与の話です。 下記のこの論文にもこの仮説が正しいのなら発症後の免疫グロブリン製剤投与は再考すべきと明記しておりワクチンの話などlancet論文はしていない事に注意が必要です。 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(85)90961-4/fulltext ここからワクチンの話をほのめかしてるのはepoch timesという反ワクチン反コロナ陰謀論媒体↓の記事の独自の見解にすぎません。 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Epoch_Times

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768583850274574735
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2FF872A9C4E9DD85039724607E78DBA2EF443987A3C0CAEAB62A60B4BDA23AD6
  • createdAtMillis - 1710538617527
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17685838502745747352FF872A9C4E9DD85039724607E78DBA2EF443987A3C0CAEAB62A60B4BDA23AD6