Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-15 16:13:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 38B54FC423738F6420F752C91BE2605B4CB6F9506CDA4922B30D97BE6C8E230B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tecnicamente, Lula teve suas condenações anuladas devido à competência do tribunal que o julgou. O teor das condenações, confirmado em duas instâncias e tribunal superior, não foi analisado para tanto, portanto, o conjunto de provas não pode ser invalidado como fatos. https://www.trf4.jus.br/trf4/controlador.php?acao=noticia_visualizar&id_noticia=14914 https://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2018/01/22/politica/1516648084_848789.html?outputType=amp https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/amp/poder/2018/01/veja-as-provas-que-foram-consideradas-na-condenacao-de-lula.shtml https://www.estadao.com.br/amp/politica/blog-do-fausto-macedo/as-provas-da-condenacao-de-lula-por-corrupcao-e-lavagem/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768457861665804343
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 38B54FC423738F6420F752C91BE2605B4CB6F9506CDA4922B30D97BE6C8E230B
  • createdAtMillis - 1710519230673
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176845786166580434338B54FC423738F6420F752C91BE2605B4CB6F9506CDA4922B30D97BE6C8E230B