Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-15 19:48:18 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A82731A2382BDBD851BA6C987F89ED99B0B92AB765176C7A5B28310A492C2D4C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was a term used to justify overturning a lower court's verdict on an appeal because they used "a woman" too many times. This would be perfect grounds for an appeal, but unfortunately, this is our dysfunctional Supreme Court of Canada and can no longer be appealed. Help! https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/20315/index.do

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768453747540111794
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A82731A2382BDBD851BA6C987F89ED99B0B92AB765176C7A5B28310A492C2D4C
  • createdAtMillis - 1710532098823
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1768453747540111794A82731A2382BDBD851BA6C987F89ED99B0B92AB765176C7A5B28310A492C2D4C