Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 21:37:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ECD9A0BF08F257FE84E7E601D34AF5EF5D33F54D33C9DAE3636334B9CE15E692
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Aunque cuestionable, el tweet solo expresa una opinión. No apunta de forma directa en contra de un dato específico del Censo, ni tergiversa información objetiva del mismo. Si bien debatibles, ambos puntos expuestos son solo apreciaciones personales.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768302932552769567
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ECD9A0BF08F257FE84E7E601D34AF5EF5D33F54D33C9DAE3636334B9CE15E692
  • createdAtMillis - 1710452231691
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1768302932552769567ECD9A0BF08F257FE84E7E601D34AF5EF5D33F54D33C9DAE3636334B9CE15E692