Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 15:59:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2769B56422E5E4AE5C6F0E8014FF9D544F92B4C2FBD037341F27C3D2FAD6E644
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Aunque cuestionable, el tweet solo expresa una opinión. No apunta de forma directa en contra de un dato específico del Censo, ni tergiversa información objetiva del mismo. Si bien debatibles, ambos puntos expuestos son solo apreciaciones personales.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768302932552769567
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2769B56422E5E4AE5C6F0E8014FF9D544F92B4C2FBD037341F27C3D2FAD6E644
  • createdAtMillis - 1710431951823
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17683029325527695672769B56422E5E4AE5C6F0E8014FF9D544F92B4C2FBD037341F27C3D2FAD6E644