Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-15 01:24:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 18BE92771B94248E8D5209248B6F7DAF0D6CEE3FE76C6CDBE1C04EB3D05D105C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Aunque cuestionable, el tweet solo expresa una opinión. No apunta de forma directa en contra de un dato específico del Censo, ni tergiversa información objetiva del mismo. Si bien debatibles, ambos puntos expuestos son solo apreciaciones personales.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768302932552769567
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 18BE92771B94248E8D5209248B6F7DAF0D6CEE3FE76C6CDBE1C04EB3D05D105C
  • createdAtMillis - 1710465853410
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176830293255276956718BE92771B94248E8D5209248B6F7DAF0D6CEE3FE76C6CDBE1C04EB3D05D105C