Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 15:07:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6779E0AAD43619714067981E6F9DF2B436D141CED221F34FB770523E966D0259
Participant Details

Original Note:

While this is technically a factual claim, Wikipedia is considered a reputable source by the Community Note guidelines. Crowd-based fact-checking has shown to be effective at addressing misinformation on the internet, such as both Community Notes and Wikipedia. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abf4393 https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07898 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.09533.pdf https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/leveraging-volunteer-fact-checking-to-identify-misinformation-about-covid-19-in-social-media/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768267032384999745
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6779E0AAD43619714067981E6F9DF2B436D141CED221F34FB770523E966D0259
  • createdAtMillis - 1710428870657
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17682670323849997456779E0AAD43619714067981E6F9DF2B436D141CED221F34FB770523E966D0259