Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 23:28:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C9AE83D1B60CC94D0E775EA2351104DD36F0E8D899F0846B3952DA41853F72C0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Application of obligations under the ECHR has not materially impacted UK asylum processes. The only recent case was a 'hold' on relocation until UK legal processes had completed - UK courts found it unlawful. https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2022/06/recent-case-kn-united-kingdom/ https://justice.org.uk/asylum-human-rights/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768254327934648485
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C9AE83D1B60CC94D0E775EA2351104DD36F0E8D899F0846B3952DA41853F72C0
  • createdAtMillis - 1710458888642
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1768254327934648485C9AE83D1B60CC94D0E775EA2351104DD36F0E8D899F0846B3952DA41853F72C0