Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-14 12:21:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E730B13272749CA2A564C203D56051F1CB46CA2128536E18FC253E6042C300D9
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court was referring to the WAY the word was used in a single sentence, which might incorrectly imply women can’t be mistaken about circumstances relating to a sexual assault. A judgement about evidentiary rules and inferences. Misconstruction/misunderstanding https://nationalpost.com/opinion/supreme-court-decision-say-word-woman-is-confusing-unfortunate/wcm/efe118d8-6482-4878-9e37-4f032dbf4bca/amp/ https://www.leaf.ca/news/supreme-court-of-canada-tsang-decision/
All Note Details