Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 14:15:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A2EEC22D7ED937C7E351D4EA0F9B92238F6833B663EAC03C1CB159FCE13A2F69
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court was referring to the WAY the word was used in a single sentence, which might incorrectly imply women can’t be mistaken about circumstances relating to a sexual assault. A judgement about evidentiary rules and inferences. Misconstruction/misunderstanding https://nationalpost.com/opinion/supreme-court-decision-say-word-woman-is-confusing-unfortunate/wcm/efe118d8-6482-4878-9e37-4f032dbf4bca/amp/ https://www.leaf.ca/news/supreme-court-of-canada-tsang-decision/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768160611148435934
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A2EEC22D7ED937C7E351D4EA0F9B92238F6833B663EAC03C1CB159FCE13A2F69
  • createdAtMillis - 1710425717719
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1768160611148435934A2EEC22D7ED937C7E351D4EA0F9B92238F6833B663EAC03C1CB159FCE13A2F69