Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 13:24:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 019774B644A1113A2FAD2910EC86604CB157B5A7633DDDCC5B414ADF86A690F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court was referring to the WAY the word was used in a single sentence, which might incorrectly imply women can’t be mistaken about circumstances relating to a sexual assault. A judgement about evidentiary rules and inferences. Misconstruction/misunderstanding https://nationalpost.com/opinion/supreme-court-decision-say-word-woman-is-confusing-unfortunate/wcm/efe118d8-6482-4878-9e37-4f032dbf4bca/amp/ https://www.leaf.ca/news/supreme-court-of-canada-tsang-decision/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768160611148435934
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 019774B644A1113A2FAD2910EC86604CB157B5A7633DDDCC5B414ADF86A690F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1710422681916
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1768160611148435934019774B644A1113A2FAD2910EC86604CB157B5A7633DDDCC5B414ADF86A690F4