Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 08:51:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF811DF214B3DEE1FB35A2D11DB71DD479CCF9709E30E9C3257DB5AAF4D6CD9C
Participant Details

Original Note:

このポストで言及されているのは植物性の食糧の生産効率や資源消費量においての優位性であり、かつ事実です。栄養面や健康面については言及されていません。 https://sdgs.kodansha.co.jp/news/knowledge/41031/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768109096979636409
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF811DF214B3DEE1FB35A2D11DB71DD479CCF9709E30E9C3257DB5AAF4D6CD9C
  • createdAtMillis - 1710406297650
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1768109096979636409FF811DF214B3DEE1FB35A2D11DB71DD479CCF9709E30E9C3257DB5AAF4D6CD9C