Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 09:23:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39882569599EAB8B71B53CB22DA999014EA22D0B1A402B6F1ABA7DDBD32EA5B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

このポストで言及されているのは植物性の食糧の生産効率や資源消費量においての優位性であり、かつ事実です。栄養面や健康面については言及されていません。 https://sdgs.kodansha.co.jp/news/knowledge/41031/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768109096979636409
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39882569599EAB8B71B53CB22DA999014EA22D0B1A402B6F1ABA7DDBD32EA5B8
  • createdAtMillis - 1710408199698
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176810909697963640939882569599EAB8B71B53CB22DA999014EA22D0B1A402B6F1ABA7DDBD32EA5B8