Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 23:12:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B8C397E998EE146C75EF6422ABD7E8651EC9BA165BDB4523E4C7C5EF924AE29
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is misleading. The Canadian Supreme Court did say the term "a woman" in a ruling was confusing. But the problem was with the "a" not "woman." The court uses the word woman 27 times in the decision. 1. https://twitter.com/pdmcleod/status/1767943408822153423 2. https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2024/2024scc7/2024scc7.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768048469435187630
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B8C397E998EE146C75EF6422ABD7E8651EC9BA165BDB4523E4C7C5EF924AE29
  • createdAtMillis - 1710371570235
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17680484694351876300B8C397E998EE146C75EF6422ABD7E8651EC9BA165BDB4523E4C7C5EF924AE29