Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 10:24:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BCDC4E018765743696780E234A80E28B6164C51EA4ACE37EEFE3392B57A558EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The text, "While the choice of the trial judge to use the words “a woman” may have been unfortunate and engendered confusion..." is in the source provided by the note, which is what the post seems to be taking out of context. https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2024/2024scc7/2024scc7.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768043827443421239
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BCDC4E018765743696780E234A80E28B6164C51EA4ACE37EEFE3392B57A558EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1710411847078
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1768043827443421239BCDC4E018765743696780E234A80E28B6164C51EA4ACE37EEFE3392B57A558EF