Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 02:27:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83CFCC89F814C21D6C4BF4083326F4097CCEF3B3CB97CC1EA278C210A07914CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The text, "While the choice of the trial judge to use the words “a woman” may have been unfortunate and engendered confusion..." is in the source provided by the note, which is what the post seems to be taking out of context. https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2024/2024scc7/2024scc7.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768043827443421239
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83CFCC89F814C21D6C4BF4083326F4097CCEF3B3CB97CC1EA278C210A07914CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1710383272342
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176804382744342123983CFCC89F814C21D6C4BF4083326F4097CCEF3B3CB97CC1EA278C210A07914CA