Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 21:48:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8512CEA667A7066A7D793861E0BCBD16DC1A520A2C23DBE4DBA62E40CFB5FB76
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2024/2024scc7/2024scc7.html#par109 The ruling stated “Where a person with a vagina testifies credibly… that they felt penile‑vaginal penetration”. The ruling also stated that “the choice of the trial judge to use the words “a woman” may have been unfortunate and engendered confusion”.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768011099457061270
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8512CEA667A7066A7D793861E0BCBD16DC1A520A2C23DBE4DBA62E40CFB5FB76
  • createdAtMillis - 1710366487888
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17680110994570612708512CEA667A7066A7D793861E0BCBD16DC1A520A2C23DBE4DBA62E40CFB5FB76