Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 21:27:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3692DBB3F6F5903DEF5D59199A10810704EE423FA374AC78E8A6E31E3B509D9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2024/2024scc7/2024scc7.html#par109 The ruling stated “Where a person with a vagina testifies credibly… that they felt penile‑vaginal penetration”. The ruling also stated that “the choice of the trial judge to use the words “a woman” may have been unfortunate and engendered confusion”.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768011099457061270
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3692DBB3F6F5903DEF5D59199A10810704EE423FA374AC78E8A6E31E3B509D9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1710365275088
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17680110994570612703692DBB3F6F5903DEF5D59199A10810704EE423FA374AC78E8A6E31E3B509D9A