Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 22:19:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF406436F934E1753E37F19760A80A45CCC953FB3EA611ADCF6C25CEB274FABE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court contrasts the trial judge's use of "a woman" with their own use of "a person with a vagina" in the same paragraph. They clearly consider "a woman" to be an "unfortunate" alternative to "a person with a vagina". See source: https://canlii.ca/t/k39g6#par109

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767974392544542941
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF406436F934E1753E37F19760A80A45CCC953FB3EA611ADCF6C25CEB274FABE
  • createdAtMillis - 1710454769687
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767974392544542941EF406436F934E1753E37F19760A80A45CCC953FB3EA611ADCF6C25CEB274FABE