Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-15 01:24:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D9E78440583C51C399BDEB4FBF1AB6A7BB4E4E9E1CE96E9BCCB488E86D194028
Participant Details

Original Note:

The defendant’s appeal is based on the trail court judge ruling that “a woman” would know the feeling of their vagina being penetrated. The Supreme Court simply clarified the language to shut down the appeal but upheld the conviction. https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2024/2024scc7/2024scc7.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767971094433247676
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D9E78440583C51C399BDEB4FBF1AB6A7BB4E4E9E1CE96E9BCCB488E86D194028
  • createdAtMillis - 1710465899962
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767971094433247676D9E78440583C51C399BDEB4FBF1AB6A7BB4E4E9E1CE96E9BCCB488E86D194028