Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 21:14:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D3D5DBFF504848DE72C74CD01F704A2620BDC21F0BDF8E21EC3AE1275D6D048A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The defendant’s appeal is based on the trail court judge ruling that “a woman” would know the feeling of their vagina being penetrated. The Supreme Court simply clarified the language to shut down the appeal but upheld the conviction. https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2024/2024scc7/2024scc7.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767971094433247676
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D3D5DBFF504848DE72C74CD01F704A2620BDC21F0BDF8E21EC3AE1275D6D048A
  • createdAtMillis - 1710364495397
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1767971094433247676D3D5DBFF504848DE72C74CD01F704A2620BDC21F0BDF8E21EC3AE1275D6D048A