Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 18:09:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 641CE96117697E07ACFED3B1E9007E8F103B1C49AAA24706B8BE25B93AF6A3B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The defendant’s appeal is based on the trail court judge ruling that “a woman” would know the feeling of their vagina being penetrated. The Supreme Court simply clarified the language to shut down the appeal but upheld the conviction. https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2024/2024scc7/2024scc7.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767971094433247676
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 641CE96117697E07ACFED3B1E9007E8F103B1C49AAA24706B8BE25B93AF6A3B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1710353358198
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767971094433247676641CE96117697E07ACFED3B1E9007E8F103B1C49AAA24706B8BE25B93AF6A3B6