Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 12:35:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 602F7EC4B1E1E6074D1C6D99BCFE600A0146B878B05CA95571012FCB4573C2B5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The defendant’s appeal is based on the trail court judge ruling that “a woman” would know the feeling of their vagina being penetrated. The Supreme Court simply clarified the language to shut down the appeal but upheld the conviction. https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2024/2024scc7/2024scc7.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767971094433247676
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 602F7EC4B1E1E6074D1C6D99BCFE600A0146B878B05CA95571012FCB4573C2B5
  • createdAtMillis - 1710419735499
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767971094433247676602F7EC4B1E1E6074D1C6D99BCFE600A0146B878B05CA95571012FCB4573C2B5