Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 02:04:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36E85A5220A8C42926F5F77A184EFF5607CB7699173C5AC20D0EFF3E1E2401B2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The defendant’s appeal is based on the trail court judge ruling that “a woman” would know the feeling of their vagina being penetrated. The Supreme Court simply clarified the language to shut down the appeal but upheld the conviction. https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2024/2024scc7/2024scc7.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767971094433247676
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36E85A5220A8C42926F5F77A184EFF5607CB7699173C5AC20D0EFF3E1E2401B2
  • createdAtMillis - 1710381857809
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176797109443324767636E85A5220A8C42926F5F77A184EFF5607CB7699173C5AC20D0EFF3E1E2401B2