Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-14 04:10:08 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: EC052DE1D6C39686B168EEB0DBB82A31449376DA821B0DB4563E038215964AFA
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is blatantly false. The SCC upheld a conviction in which the trial judge referred to the complaint as "a woman" instead of 'the' or 'a' complainant; the judge's original statement was in reference to believing "a woman" testimony regarding her SA. https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/20315/index.do
All Note Details