Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-14 15:50:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E9FF2A1C24F12E393F0AFB25E1B64D84F4B18C0E5B44E6AA59383DE8A1757140
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is blatantly false. The SCC upheld a conviction in which the trial judge referred to the complaint as "a woman" instead of 'the' or 'a' complainant; the judge's original statement was in reference to believing "a woman" testimony regarding her SA. https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/20315/index.do
All Note Details