Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-15 01:25:58 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D9E78440583C51C399BDEB4FBF1AB6A7BB4E4E9E1CE96E9BCCB488E86D194028
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is blatantly false. The SCC upheld a conviction in which the trial judge referred to the complaint as "a woman" instead of 'the' or 'a' complainant; the judge's original statement was in reference to believing "a woman" testimony regarding her SA. https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/20315/index.do
All Note Details