Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-14 01:52:17 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: CC06521B9E60A0EDF73B7C94488AB5B4F02B03C37C425F4A9D14F1D2CA847AD9
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is blatantly false. The SCC upheld a conviction in which the trial judge referred to the complaint as "a woman" instead of 'the' or 'a' complainant; the judge's original statement was in reference to believing "a woman" testimony regarding her SA. https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/20315/index.do
All Note Details