Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-13 17:59:33 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B163C5983A80F5B3ACDEB6FDA217C12ACA136064D5F2E49359ADA529C45248A5
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is blatantly false. The SCC upheld a conviction in which the trial judge referred to the complaint as "a woman" instead of 'the' or 'a' complainant; the judge's original statement was in reference to believing "a woman" testimony regarding her SA. https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/20315/index.do
All Note Details