Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 13:10:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 52BB1CB5F82EB1059CCAE29CEDA80BCA77E23F200B4EECF6DB196F631562300D
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is blatantly false. The SCC upheld a conviction in which the trial judge referred to the complaint as "a woman" instead of 'the' or 'a' complainant; the judge's original statement was in reference to believing "a woman" testimony regarding her SA. https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/20315/index.do

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767952278902784006
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 52BB1CB5F82EB1059CCAE29CEDA80BCA77E23F200B4EECF6DB196F631562300D
  • createdAtMillis - 1710421831079
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176795227890278400652BB1CB5F82EB1059CCAE29CEDA80BCA77E23F200B4EECF6DB196F631562300D