Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-13 17:53:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4888993AB980A8D14F88E643239D9C9DC674834ABB01826BCA5BEE7B7082BDBF
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is blatantly false. The SCC upheld a conviction in which the trial judge referred to the complaint as "a woman" instead of 'the' or 'a' complainant; the judge's original statement was in reference to believing "a woman" testimony regarding her SA. https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/20315/index.do
All Note Details