Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-14 02:04:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 36E85A5220A8C42926F5F77A184EFF5607CB7699173C5AC20D0EFF3E1E2401B2
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is blatantly false. The SCC upheld a conviction in which the trial judge referred to the complaint as "a woman" instead of 'the' or 'a' complainant; the judge's original statement was in reference to believing "a woman" testimony regarding her SA. https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/20315/index.do
All Note Details