Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-13 22:44:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0F676A639F86D6427380643792A319A4F90A52F629A52A0607FB06C2DC878027
Participant Details
Original Note:
This is blatantly false. The SCC upheld a conviction in which the trial judge referred to the complaint as "a woman" instead of 'the' or 'a' complainant; the judge's original statement was in reference to believing "a woman" testimony regarding her SA. https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/20315/index.do
All Note Details