Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 16:00:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8C3BFC7C1CED44DB5F5F79F83D54EAF4F7E79540CE88F3C2C1A143AA764CB763
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Scientific American is not a reliable source of history or science, being a publication of non-peer-reviewed articles and opinion pieces.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767931681191624739
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8C3BFC7C1CED44DB5F5F79F83D54EAF4F7E79540CE88F3C2C1A143AA764CB763
  • createdAtMillis - 1710345606566
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17679316811916247398C3BFC7C1CED44DB5F5F79F83D54EAF4F7E79540CE88F3C2C1A143AA764CB763