Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 17:38:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1758DCACE82346BB48C090AA75E661109E2FBAA33B762CB47F21EDB4E5A953A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Scientific American is not a reliable source of history or science, being a publication of non-peer-reviewed articles and opinion pieces.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767931681191624739
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1758DCACE82346BB48C090AA75E661109E2FBAA33B762CB47F21EDB4E5A953A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1710351509750
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17679316811916247391758DCACE82346BB48C090AA75E661109E2FBAA33B762CB47F21EDB4E5A953A0