Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-13 18:04:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 068C390EB267B4B3447CDBC70616E5E10B7AB49ED22F05AFB253AB6B3513E2B2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Scientific American is not a reliable source of history or science, being a publication of non-peer-reviewed articles and opinion pieces.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1767931681191624739
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 068C390EB267B4B3447CDBC70616E5E10B7AB49ED22F05AFB253AB6B3513E2B2
  • createdAtMillis - 1710353069398
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1767931681191624739068C390EB267B4B3447CDBC70616E5E10B7AB49ED22F05AFB253AB6B3513E2B2